China (People's Republic of) vs Iceland: Effective tax rates - Corporate tax statistics — Effective marginal

China (People's Republic of)
18.27 Percentage of taxable income
in 2025
Iceland
144.03 Percentage of taxable income
in 2025
China (People's Republic of) rank
3rd
Iceland rank
4th

Effective tax rates - Corporate tax statistics — Effective marginal over time

  • China (People's Republic of)
  • Iceland
050100150200201720212025

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 144.03 Percentage of taxable income against 18.27 Percentage of taxable income in China (People's Republic of), a difference of 125.76 Percentage of taxable income.

That makes Iceland's figure about 7.9 times China (People's Republic of)'s.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.

China (People's Republic of) ranks 3rd and Iceland ranks 4th of 3 groups.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China (People's Republic of) Iceland Difference Ahead
2010s 20.85 Percentage of taxable income 25.78 Percentage of taxable income 4.93 Percentage of taxable income Iceland
2020s 20.36 Percentage of taxable income 104.45 Percentage of taxable income 84.09 Percentage of taxable income Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher effective tax rates - corporate tax statistics — effective marginal, China (People's Republic of) or Iceland?
Iceland, at 144.03 Percentage of taxable income against 18.27 Percentage of taxable income in China (People's Republic of) as of 2025.
What is the difference in effective tax rates - corporate tax statistics — effective marginal between China (People's Republic of) and Iceland?
125.76 Percentage of taxable income, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China (People's Republic of) and Iceland?
9 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2025.
How do China (People's Republic of) and Iceland rank globally for effective tax rates - corporate tax statistics — effective marginal?
China (People's Republic of) ranks 3rd and Iceland ranks 4th of 3 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Effective tax rates - Corporate tax statistics — Effective marginal tax rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China (People's Republic of) vs Iceland: Effective tax rates - Corporate tax statistics — Effective marginal. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/effective-tax-rates-corporate-tax-statistics-effective-marginal-tax-rate/china-people-s-republic-of/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/effective-tax-rates-corporate-tax-statistics-effective-marginal-tax-rate/china-people-s-republic-of/iceland/">China (People's Republic of) vs Iceland: Effective tax rates - Corporate tax statistics — Effective marginal</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Effective tax rates - Corporate tax statistics — Effective marginal tax rate
Unit
Percentage of taxable income
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
105 places, 936 data points, 2017–2025
Last refreshed

This table reports synthetic tax policy indicators calculated on the basis of a prospective, hypothetical investment project. Unlike backward-looking ETRs, they do not incorporate any information about firms' actual tax payments.The OECD methodology has been described in detail in the OECD Taxation Working Paper No. 38 (Hanappi, 2018). Further methodological information is available in the explanatory annex.