Botswana vs Cameroon: Effective tax rates - Corporate tax statistics — Effective marginal
Effective tax rates - Corporate tax statistics — Effective marginal over time
- Botswana
- Cameroon
How they compare
Cameroon currently reports 364.49 Percentage of taxable income against 173.38 Percentage of taxable income in Botswana, a difference of 191.11 Percentage of taxable income.
That makes Cameroon's figure about 2.1 times Botswana's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Cameroon has been ahead every year.
Botswana ranks 3rd and Cameroon ranks 1st of 99 countries.
Cameroon has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Cameroon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 190.56 Percentage of taxable income | 257.93 Percentage of taxable income | 67.37 Percentage of taxable income | Cameroon |
| 2020s | 181.3 Percentage of taxable income | 330.68 Percentage of taxable income | 149.37 Percentage of taxable income | Cameroon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher effective tax rates - corporate tax statistics — effective marginal, Botswana or Cameroon?
- Cameroon, at 364.49 Percentage of taxable income against 173.38 Percentage of taxable income in Botswana as of 2025.
- What is the difference in effective tax rates - corporate tax statistics — effective marginal between Botswana and Cameroon?
- 191.11 Percentage of taxable income, with Cameroon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Cameroon?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2025.
- How do Botswana and Cameroon rank globally for effective tax rates - corporate tax statistics — effective marginal?
- Botswana ranks 3rd and Cameroon ranks 1st of 99 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Effective tax rates - Corporate tax statistics — Effective marginal tax rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This table reports synthetic tax policy indicators calculated on the basis of a prospective, hypothetical investment project. Unlike backward-looking ETRs, they do not incorporate any information about firms' actual tax payments.The OECD methodology has been described in detail in the OECD Taxation Working Paper No. 38 (Hanappi, 2018). Further methodological information is available in the explanatory annex.