Panama vs Tunisia: Effective tax rates - Corporate tax statistics — Effective average
Effective tax rates - Corporate tax statistics — Effective average over time
- Panama
- Tunisia
How they compare
Panama currently reports 20.25 Percentage of taxable income against 20.11 Percentage of taxable income in Tunisia, a difference of 0.14 Percentage of taxable income.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Tunisia ahead.
Panama ranks 66th and Tunisia ranks 67th of 99 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 20.32 Percentage of taxable income | 22.9 Percentage of taxable income | 2.58 Percentage of taxable income | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 19.59 Percentage of taxable income | 17.21 Percentage of taxable income | 2.38 Percentage of taxable income | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher effective tax rates - corporate tax statistics — effective average, Panama or Tunisia?
- Panama, at 20.25 Percentage of taxable income against 20.11 Percentage of taxable income in Tunisia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in effective tax rates - corporate tax statistics — effective average between Panama and Tunisia?
- 0.14 Percentage of taxable income, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Tunisia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2025.
- How do Panama and Tunisia rank globally for effective tax rates - corporate tax statistics — effective average?
- Panama ranks 66th and Tunisia ranks 67th of 99 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Effective tax rates - Corporate tax statistics — Effective average tax rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This table reports synthetic tax policy indicators calculated on the basis of a prospective, hypothetical investment project. Unlike backward-looking ETRs, they do not incorporate any information about firms' actual tax payments.The OECD methodology has been described in detail in the OECD Taxation Working Paper No. 38 (Hanappi, 2018). Further methodological information is available in the explanatory annex.