Egypt vs Israel: Effective tax rates - Corporate tax statistics — Effective average
Effective tax rates - Corporate tax statistics — Effective average over time
- Egypt
- Israel
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 22.1 Percentage of taxable income against 21.71 Percentage of taxable income in Israel, a difference of 0.39 Percentage of taxable income.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Egypt ahead.
Egypt ranks 59th and Israel ranks 61st of 99 countries.
Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Israel | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 22 Percentage of taxable income | 19.35 Percentage of taxable income | 2.65 Percentage of taxable income | Egypt |
| 2020s | 21.08 Percentage of taxable income | 20.7 Percentage of taxable income | 0.3755 Percentage of taxable income | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher effective tax rates - corporate tax statistics — effective average, Egypt or Israel?
- Egypt, at 22.1 Percentage of taxable income against 21.71 Percentage of taxable income in Israel as of 2025.
- What is the difference in effective tax rates - corporate tax statistics — effective average between Egypt and Israel?
- 0.39 Percentage of taxable income, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Israel?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2025.
- How do Egypt and Israel rank globally for effective tax rates - corporate tax statistics — effective average?
- Egypt ranks 59th and Israel ranks 61st of 99 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Effective tax rates - Corporate tax statistics — Effective average tax rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This table reports synthetic tax policy indicators calculated on the basis of a prospective, hypothetical investment project. Unlike backward-looking ETRs, they do not incorporate any information about firms' actual tax payments.The OECD methodology has been described in detail in the OECD Taxation Working Paper No. 38 (Hanappi, 2018). Further methodological information is available in the explanatory annex.