Chile vs Serbia: Effective tax rates - Corporate tax statistics — Effective average
Effective tax rates - Corporate tax statistics — Effective average over time
- Chile
- Serbia
How they compare
Chile currently reports 17.95 Percentage of taxable income against 16.18 Percentage of taxable income in Serbia, a difference of 1.77 Percentage of taxable income.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 74th and Serbia ranks 76th of 99 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 15.24 Percentage of taxable income | 12.52 Percentage of taxable income | 2.72 Percentage of taxable income | Chile |
| 2020s | 17.46 Percentage of taxable income | 14.82 Percentage of taxable income | 2.64 Percentage of taxable income | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher effective tax rates - corporate tax statistics — effective average, Chile or Serbia?
- Chile, at 17.95 Percentage of taxable income against 16.18 Percentage of taxable income in Serbia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in effective tax rates - corporate tax statistics — effective average between Chile and Serbia?
- 1.77 Percentage of taxable income, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Serbia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2025.
- How do Chile and Serbia rank globally for effective tax rates - corporate tax statistics — effective average?
- Chile ranks 74th and Serbia ranks 76th of 99 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Effective tax rates - Corporate tax statistics — Effective average tax rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This table reports synthetic tax policy indicators calculated on the basis of a prospective, hypothetical investment project. Unlike backward-looking ETRs, they do not incorporate any information about firms' actual tax payments.The OECD methodology has been described in detail in the OECD Taxation Working Paper No. 38 (Hanappi, 2018). Further methodological information is available in the explanatory annex.