Latvia vs Serbia: Effect of social transfers on income quintile share ratio S80/S20
Latvia
1.5 Ratio
in 2025
Serbia
1.6 Ratio
in 2025
Latvia rank
25th
Serbia rank
24th
Effect of social transfers on income quintile share ratio S80/S20 over time
- Latvia
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 1.6 Ratio against 1.5 Ratio in Latvia, a difference of 0.1 Ratio.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 25th and Serbia ranks 24th of 45 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.96 Ratio | 7.01 Ratio | 5.06 Ratio | Serbia |
| 2020s | 1.72 Ratio | 2.25 Ratio | 0.5333 Ratio | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher effect of social transfers on income quintile share ratio s80/s20, Latvia or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 1.6 Ratio against 1.5 Ratio in Latvia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in effect of social transfers on income quintile share ratio s80/s20 between Latvia and Serbia?
- 0.1 Ratio, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Serbia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2025.
- How do Latvia and Serbia rank globally for effect of social transfers on income quintile share ratio s80/s20?
- Latvia ranks 25th and Serbia ranks 24th of 45 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Eurostat, published as Effect of social transfers on income quintile share ratio S80/S20. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.