France vs Korea: Economic indicators by access to city typology — Employment

France
22.29 million Persons
in 2024
Korea
25.32 million Persons
in 2024
France rank
4th
Korea rank
1st

Economic indicators by access to city typology — Employment over time

  • France
  • Korea
010.0M20.0M30.0M200020122024

How they compare

Korea currently reports 25.32 million Persons against 22.29 million Persons in France, a difference of 3.03 million Persons.

That makes Korea's figure about 1.1 times France's.

Across all 17 years both countries report, Korea has been ahead every year.

France ranks 4th and Korea ranks 1st of 32 countries.

Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade France Korea Difference Ahead
2000s 19.45 million Persons 21.21 million Persons 1.76 million Persons Korea
2010s 19.96 million Persons 22.98 million Persons 3.02 million Persons Korea
2020s 21.68 million Persons 24.76 million Persons 3.08 million Persons Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher economic indicators by access to city typology — employment, France or Korea?
Korea, at 25.32 million Persons against 22.29 million Persons in France as of 2024.
What is the difference in economic indicators by access to city typology — employment between France and Korea?
3.03 million Persons, with Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for France and Korea?
17 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2024.
How do France and Korea rank globally for economic indicators by access to city typology — employment?
France ranks 4th and Korea ranks 1st of 32 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Economic indicators by access to city typology — Employment. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

France vs Korea: Economic indicators by access to city typology — Employment. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/economic-indicators-by-access-to-city-typology-employment/france/korea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/economic-indicators-by-access-to-city-typology-employment/france/korea/">France vs Korea: Economic indicators by access to city typology — Employment</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Economic indicators by access to city typology — Employment
Unit
Persons
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
34 places, 817 data points, 1993–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides economic indicators aggregated at national level and broken down by territorial typology according to the population's access to cities. Data source and definition The indicators include GDP, GDP per capita, gross value added, employment at place of work and labour productivity by type of territory. Data is collected from Eurostat (reg_eco10) for EU countries and via delegates of the OECD Working Party on Territorial Indicators (WPTI), as well as from national statistical offices' websites. The indicators are aggregated data at the national level, using the typology of small (TL3) regions to calculate totals or averages for all metropolitan large regions, metropolitan midsize regions, near a midsize/large FUA regions, near a small FUA regions and remote regions. Territorial typology on the population's access to cities Territorial typologies helps to assess differences in socio-economic trends in regions, both within and across countries and to highlight the specific issues faced by each type of region. The OECD territorial typology on access to cities uses the concept of functional urban areas (FUA) – composed of urban centres and their commuting areas – and classifies small (TL3) regions (Fadic et al., 2019) according to the following criteria: Metropolitan regions, if more than half of the population live in a FUA. Metropolitan regions are further classified into: metropolitan large, if more than half of the population live in a (large) FUA of at least 1.5 million inhabitants; and metropolitan midsize, if more than half of the population live in a (midsize) FUA of at 250 000 to 1.5 million inhabitants. Non-metropolitan regions, if less than half of the population live in a midsize/large FUA. These regions are further classified according to their level of access to FUAs of different sizes: near a midsize/large FUA if more than half of the population live within a 60-minute drive from a midsize/large FUA (of more than 250 000 inhabitants) or if the TL3 region contains more than 80% of the area of a midsize/large FUA; near a small FUA if the region does not have access to a midsize/large FUA and at least half of its population have access to a small FUA (i.e. between 50 000 and 250 000 inhabitants) within a 60-minute drive, or contains 80% of the area of a small FUA; and remote, otherwise. List of OECD regions and typologies are presented in the OECD Territorial correspondence table (xlsx). Maps of For more information, see the OECD Territorial grid (pdf). Cite this dataset OECD Regions, Cities and Local Areas database http://oe.cd/geostats. Further information OECD Regions and Cities Statistical Atlas OECD Regions and Cities at a Glance For questions and/or comments, please email RegionStat@oecd.org.