Republic of Korea vs Portugal: Domestic finance, S1 - Privatization
Republic of Korea
2
in 2014
Portugal
2
in 2014
Republic of Korea rank
43rd
Portugal rank
43rd
Domestic finance, S1 - Privatization over time
- Republic of Korea
- Portugal
How they compare
Republic of Korea currently reports 2 against 2 in Portugal, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 42 shared years of data; in 1973 it was Portugal ahead.
Republic of Korea ranks 43rd and Portugal ranks 43rd of 90 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Republic of Korea averaged higher in 3 and Portugal in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Republic of Korea | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 1 | 0.1429 | 0.8571 | Republic of Korea |
| 1980s | 1.9 | 0 | 1.9 | Republic of Korea |
| 1990s | 1.4 | 0.8 | 0.6 | Republic of Korea |
| 2000s | 0.4 | 1.4 | 1 | Portugal |
| 2010s | 1.6 | 2 | 0.4 | Portugal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher domestic finance, s1 - privatization, Republic of Korea or Portugal?
- Republic of Korea, at 2 against 2 in Portugal as of 2014.
- What is the difference in domestic finance, s1 - privatization between Republic of Korea and Portugal?
- 0, with Republic of Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Korea and Portugal?
- 42 years are reported by both, from 1973 to 2014.
- How do Republic of Korea and Portugal rank globally for domestic finance, s1 - privatization?
- Republic of Korea ranks 43rd and Portugal ranks 43rd of 90 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Domestic finance, S1 - Privatization. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The SRD contains data on a wide range of structural policies across different countries. These policies are things that affect how markets function, like labor laws, regulations on businesses, and trade policies.