Australia vs Hong Kong, China: Domestic finance, S1 - Privatization
Australia
3
in 2014
Hong Kong, China
3
in 2014
Australia rank
1st
Hong Kong, China rank
1st
Domestic finance, S1 - Privatization over time
- Australia
- Hong Kong, China
How they compare
Australia currently reports 3 against 3 in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0.
Across all 42 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 1st and Hong Kong, China ranks 1st of 90 countries.
Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Hong Kong, China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0 | 3 | 3 | Hong Kong, China |
| 1980s | 0 | 3 | 3 | Hong Kong, China |
| 1990s | 1.8 | 3 | 1.2 | Hong Kong, China |
| 2000s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher domestic finance, s1 - privatization, Australia or Hong Kong, China?
- Australia, at 3 against 3 in Hong Kong, China as of 2014.
- What is the difference in domestic finance, s1 - privatization between Australia and Hong Kong, China?
- 0, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Hong Kong, China?
- 42 years are reported by both, from 1973 to 2014.
- How do Australia and Hong Kong, China rank globally for domestic finance, s1 - privatization?
- Australia ranks 1st and Hong Kong, China ranks 1st of 90 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Domestic finance, S1 - Privatization. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The SRD contains data on a wide range of structural policies across different countries. These policies are things that affect how markets function, like labor laws, regulations on businesses, and trade policies.