Belgium vs Sweden: Distributive trades by size class of turnover (NACE Rev. 2, G)
Belgium
141,124
in 2018
Sweden
113,177
in 2018
Belgium rank
14th
Sweden rank
16th
Distributive trades by size class of turnover (NACE Rev. 2, G) over time
- Belgium
- Sweden
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 141,124 against 113,177 in Sweden, a difference of 27,947.
That makes Belgium's figure about 1.2 times Sweden's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 14th and Sweden ranks 16th of 35 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 137,780 | 124,195 | 13,586 | Belgium |
| 2010s | 137,527 | 126,276 | 11,251 | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher distributive trades by size class of turnover (nace rev. 2, g), Belgium or Sweden?
- Belgium, at 141,124 against 113,177 in Sweden as of 2018.
- What is the difference in distributive trades by size class of turnover (nace rev. 2, g) between Belgium and Sweden?
- 27,947, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Sweden?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2018.
- How do Belgium and Sweden rank globally for distributive trades by size class of turnover (nace rev. 2, g)?
- Belgium ranks 14th and Sweden ranks 16th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Eurostat, published as Distributive trades by size class of turnover (NACE Rev. 2, G) (2008-2018). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.