South Sudan vs Türkiye: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- South Sudan
- Türkiye
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 100 current LCU against 20.5 current LCU in Türkiye, a difference of 79.5 current LCU.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 4.9 times Türkiye's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2008 it was South Sudan ahead.
South Sudan ranks 66th and Türkiye ranks 69th of 186 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, South Sudan averaged higher in 1 and Türkiye in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Sudan | Türkiye | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -173.33 million current LCU | -50 current LCU | 173.33 million current LCU | Türkiye |
| 2010s | 9.09 million current LCU | -16.67 current LCU | 9.09 million current LCU | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, South Sudan or Türkiye?
- South Sudan, at 100 current LCU against 20.5 current LCU in Türkiye as of 2015.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between South Sudan and Türkiye?
- 79.5 current LCU, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Türkiye?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2015.
- How do South Sudan and Türkiye rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- South Sudan ranks 66th and Türkiye ranks 69th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.