Singapore vs Turkmenistan: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Singapore
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Turkmenistan currently reports 24.48 billion current LCU against 6.13 billion current LCU in Singapore, a difference of 18.35 billion current LCU.
That makes Turkmenistan's figure about 4.0 times Singapore's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Singapore ahead.
Singapore ranks 23rd and Turkmenistan ranks 20th of 186 countries.
Turkmenistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Singapore | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1.16 billion current LCU | -139.37 million current LCU | 1.02 billion current LCU | Turkmenistan |
| 2000s | -2.00 billion current LCU | 3.82 billion current LCU | 5.82 billion current LCU | Turkmenistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Singapore or Turkmenistan?
- Turkmenistan, at 24.48 billion current LCU against 6.13 billion current LCU in Singapore as of 2009.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Singapore and Turkmenistan?
- 18.35 billion current LCU, with Turkmenistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and Turkmenistan?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2009.
- How do Singapore and Turkmenistan rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Singapore ranks 23rd and Turkmenistan ranks 20th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.