Rwanda vs Sao Tome and Principe: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Rwanda
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports -600 current LCU against -3,700 current LCU in Rwanda, a difference of 3,100 current LCU.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
Rwanda ranks 133rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 132nd of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 1 and Sao Tome and Principe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 current LCU | -350 current LCU | 350 current LCU | Rwanda |
| 2010s | -290 current LCU | -209.54 current LCU | 80.46 current LCU | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2020s | -2,517 current LCU | 27,567 current LCU | 30,083 current LCU | Sao Tome and Principe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Rwanda or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at -600 current LCU against -3,700 current LCU in Rwanda as of 2025.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Rwanda and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 3,100 current LCU, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2025.
- How do Rwanda and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Rwanda ranks 133rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 132nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.