Nicaragua vs Philippines: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Nicaragua
- Philippines
How they compare
Philippines currently reports -0.0176 current LCU against -100 current LCU in Nicaragua, a difference of 99.98 current LCU.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Nicaragua ahead.
Nicaragua ranks 127th and Philippines ranks 125th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Nicaragua averaged higher in 3 and Philippines in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 504.38 million current LCU | 11.25 billion current LCU | 10.75 billion current LCU | Philippines |
| 2000s | 160.68 million current LCU | -10 current LCU | 160.68 million current LCU | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 20 current LCU | 20 current LCU | 0 current LCU | Nicaragua |
| 2020s | 16.67 current LCU | 16.66 current LCU | 0.0089 current LCU | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Nicaragua or Philippines?
- Philippines, at -0.0176 current LCU against -100 current LCU in Nicaragua as of 2025.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Nicaragua and Philippines?
- 99.98 current LCU, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Philippines?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2025.
- How do Nicaragua and Philippines rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Nicaragua ranks 127th and Philippines ranks 125th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.