Macau, China vs Papua New Guinea: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Macau, China
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Macau, China currently reports 0 current LCU against 0 current LCU in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0 current LCU.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 23 shared years of data; in 1982 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Macau, China ranks 77th and Papua New Guinea ranks 77th of 186 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Macau, China | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 current LCU | 1.82 million current LCU | 1.82 million current LCU | Papua New Guinea |
| 1990s | 0 current LCU | 10,200 current LCU | 10,200 current LCU | Papua New Guinea |
| 2000s | 0 current LCU | 0 current LCU | 0 current LCU | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Macau, China or Papua New Guinea?
- Macau, China, at 0 current LCU against 0 current LCU in Papua New Guinea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Macau, China and Papua New Guinea?
- 0 current LCU, with Macau, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Macau, China and Papua New Guinea?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2004.
- How do Macau, China and Papua New Guinea rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Macau, China ranks 77th and Papua New Guinea ranks 77th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.