Latvia vs Mauritania: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Latvia
- Mauritania
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0 current LCU against 0 current LCU in Mauritania, a difference of 0 current LCU.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 77th and Mauritania ranks 77th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Mauritania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -200 current LCU | -1.85 billion current LCU | 1.85 billion current LCU | Latvia |
| 2000s | -100 current LCU | 0 current LCU | 100 current LCU | Mauritania |
| 2010s | 300 current LCU | 156.39 million current LCU | 156.39 million current LCU | Mauritania |
| 2020s | 333.33 current LCU | 0 current LCU | 333.33 current LCU | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Latvia or Mauritania?
- Latvia, at 0 current LCU against 0 current LCU in Mauritania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Latvia and Mauritania?
- 0 current LCU, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Mauritania?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
- How do Latvia and Mauritania rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Latvia ranks 77th and Mauritania ranks 77th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.