Haiti vs Norway: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Haiti
- Norway
How they compare
Haiti currently reports 1.00 million current LCU against 1.00 million current LCU in Norway, a difference of 0 current LCU.
The two have swapped places 16 times across 38 shared years of data; in 1988 it was Norway ahead.
Haiti ranks 40th and Norway ranks 40th of 186 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Haiti | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 current LCU | 5.50 million current LCU | 5.50 million current LCU | Norway |
| 1990s | 189,800 current LCU | 900,000 current LCU | 710,200 current LCU | Norway |
| 2000s | -99,320 current LCU | 0 current LCU | 99,320 current LCU | Norway |
| 2010s | -4.13 billion current LCU | 0 current LCU | 4.13 billion current LCU | Norway |
| 2020s | 174,950 current LCU | 333,333 current LCU | 158,383 current LCU | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Haiti or Norway?
- Haiti, at 1.00 million current LCU against 1.00 million current LCU in Norway as of 2025.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Haiti and Norway?
- 0 current LCU, with Haiti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and Norway?
- 38 years are reported by both, from 1988 to 2025.
- How do Haiti and Norway rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Haiti ranks 40th and Norway ranks 40th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.