Georgia vs Latvia: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Georgia
- Latvia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 0 current LCU against 0 current LCU in Latvia, a difference of 0 current LCU.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Latvia ahead.
Georgia ranks 77th and Latvia ranks 77th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -145.16 million current LCU | -200 current LCU | 145.16 million current LCU | Latvia |
| 2000s | -384.40 million current LCU | -100 current LCU | 384.40 million current LCU | Latvia |
| 2010s | -87,760 current LCU | 300 current LCU | 88,060 current LCU | Latvia |
| 2020s | 43,733 current LCU | 333.33 current LCU | 43,400 current LCU | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Georgia or Latvia?
- Georgia, at 0 current LCU against 0 current LCU in Latvia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Georgia and Latvia?
- 0 current LCU, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Latvia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
- How do Georgia and Latvia rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Georgia ranks 77th and Latvia ranks 77th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.