Finland vs Kiribati: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Finland
- Kiribati
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 1.75 million current LCU against 1.00 million current LCU in Finland, a difference of 751,440 current LCU.
That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.8 times Finland's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 40th and Kiribati ranks 39th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 2 and Kiribati in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 695.25 million current LCU | 414,950 current LCU | 694.84 million current LCU | Finland |
| 2010s | -233.30 million current LCU | -2.38 million current LCU | 230.92 million current LCU | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 84.40 million current LCU | -8.67 million current LCU | 93.07 million current LCU | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Finland or Kiribati?
- Kiribati, at 1.75 million current LCU against 1.00 million current LCU in Finland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Finland and Kiribati?
- 751,440 current LCU, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Kiribati?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Finland and Kiribati rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Finland ranks 40th and Kiribati ranks 39th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.