Eswatini vs Hungary: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Eswatini
- Hungary
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 0 current LCU against 0 current LCU in Hungary, a difference of 0 current LCU.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Hungary ahead.
Eswatini ranks 77th and Hungary ranks 77th of 186 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Hungary | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -28.57 current LCU | 0 current LCU | 28.57 current LCU | Hungary |
| 2020s | -40 current LCU | 0 current LCU | 40 current LCU | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Eswatini or Hungary?
- Eswatini, at 0 current LCU against 0 current LCU in Hungary as of 2024.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Eswatini and Hungary?
- 0 current LCU, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Hungary?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2024.
- How do Eswatini and Hungary rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Eswatini ranks 77th and Hungary ranks 77th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.