Estonia vs Kiribati: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Estonia
- Kiribati
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 28.88 million current LCU against 1.75 million current LCU in Kiribati, a difference of 27.13 million current LCU.
That makes Estonia's figure about 16.5 times Kiribati's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 38th and Kiribati ranks 39th of 186 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 56.88 million current LCU | 414,950 current LCU | 56.46 million current LCU | Estonia |
| 2010s | 24.40 million current LCU | -2.38 million current LCU | 26.78 million current LCU | Estonia |
| 2020s | 123.51 million current LCU | -8.67 million current LCU | 132.18 million current LCU | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Estonia or Kiribati?
- Estonia, at 28.88 million current LCU against 1.75 million current LCU in Kiribati as of 2025.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Estonia and Kiribati?
- 27.13 million current LCU, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Kiribati?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Estonia and Kiribati rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Estonia ranks 38th and Kiribati ranks 39th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.