Eritrea vs Puerto Rico: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Eritrea
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Puerto Rico currently reports -5.12 billion current LCU against -8.36 billion current LCU in Eritrea, a difference of 3.24 billion current LCU.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 176th and Puerto Rico ranks 175th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 2 and Puerto Rico in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -3.67 million current LCU | -1.88 billion current LCU | 1.87 billion current LCU | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 10 current LCU | -3.38 billion current LCU | 3.38 billion current LCU | Eritrea |
| 2010s | -8.24 billion current LCU | 1.43 billion current LCU | 9.67 billion current LCU | Puerto Rico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Eritrea or Puerto Rico?
- Puerto Rico, at -5.12 billion current LCU against -8.36 billion current LCU in Eritrea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Eritrea and Puerto Rico?
- 3.24 billion current LCU, with Puerto Rico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Puerto Rico?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2011.
- How do Eritrea and Puerto Rico rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Eritrea ranks 176th and Puerto Rico ranks 175th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.