Equatorial Guinea vs Rwanda: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports -3,700 current LCU against -27,700 current LCU in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 24,000 current LCU.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 136th and Rwanda ranks 133rd of 186 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20 current LCU | -20 current LCU | 40 current LCU | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 44,030 current LCU | -290 current LCU | 44,320 current LCU | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2020s | 50,217 current LCU | -2,517 current LCU | 52,733 current LCU | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Equatorial Guinea or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at -3,700 current LCU against -27,700 current LCU in Equatorial Guinea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Equatorial Guinea and Rwanda?
- 24,000 current LCU, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Rwanda?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Rwanda rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 136th and Rwanda ranks 133rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.