Equatorial Guinea vs Namibia: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Namibia
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports -27,700 current LCU against -27,717 current LCU in Namibia, a difference of 17 current LCU.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Namibia ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 135th and Namibia ranks 136th of 185 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20 current LCU | 646.47 million current LCU | 646.47 million current LCU | Namibia |
| 2010s | 44,030 current LCU | 251.30 million current LCU | 251.26 million current LCU | Namibia |
| 2020s | 50,217 current LCU | 71,432 current LCU | 21,215 current LCU | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Equatorial Guinea or Namibia?
- Equatorial Guinea, at -27,700 current LCU against -27,717 current LCU in Namibia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Equatorial Guinea and Namibia?
- 17 current LCU, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Namibia?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Namibia rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 135th and Namibia ranks 136th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.