Equatorial Guinea vs Guinea: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Guinea
How they compare
Guinea currently reports -13,490 current LCU against -27,700 current LCU in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 14,210 current LCU.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 136th and Guinea ranks 135th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 2 and Guinea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20 current LCU | 980.62 billion current LCU | 980.62 billion current LCU | Guinea |
| 2010s | 44,030 current LCU | -2.15 million current LCU | 2.19 million current LCU | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2020s | 50,217 current LCU | -1.16 million current LCU | 1.21 million current LCU | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Equatorial Guinea or Guinea?
- Guinea, at -13,490 current LCU against -27,700 current LCU in Equatorial Guinea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Equatorial Guinea and Guinea?
- 14,210 current LCU, with Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Guinea?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Guinea rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 136th and Guinea ranks 135th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.