Equatorial Guinea vs France: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- France
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports -27,700 current LCU against -100,000 current LCU in France, a difference of 72,300 current LCU.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 136th and France ranks 139th of 186 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | France | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20 current LCU | 0 current LCU | 20 current LCU | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 44,030 current LCU | 0 current LCU | 44,030 current LCU | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2020s | 50,217 current LCU | -16,667 current LCU | 66,883 current LCU | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Equatorial Guinea or France?
- Equatorial Guinea, at -27,700 current LCU against -100,000 current LCU in France as of 2025.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Equatorial Guinea and France?
- 72,300 current LCU, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and France?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and France rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 136th and France ranks 139th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.