Cuba vs Kiribati: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Cuba
- Kiribati
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 1.75 million current LCU against 1.00 million current LCU in Cuba, a difference of 751,440 current LCU.
That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.8 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 40th and Kiribati ranks 39th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 2 and Kiribati in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -183,825 current LCU | 414,950 current LCU | 598,775 current LCU | Kiribati |
| 2010s | -22,720 current LCU | -2.38 million current LCU | 2.36 million current LCU | Cuba |
| 2020s | 0 current LCU | -8.67 million current LCU | 8.67 million current LCU | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Cuba or Kiribati?
- Kiribati, at 1.75 million current LCU against 1.00 million current LCU in Cuba as of 2024.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Cuba and Kiribati?
- 751,440 current LCU, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Kiribati?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Kiribati rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Cuba ranks 40th and Kiribati ranks 39th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.