Cuba vs Estonia: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Cuba
- Estonia
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 28.88 million current LCU against 1.00 million current LCU in Cuba, a difference of 27.88 million current LCU.
That makes Estonia's figure about 28.9 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Estonia ahead.
Cuba ranks 40th and Estonia ranks 38th of 186 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 16.86 million current LCU | 26.79 million current LCU | 9.93 million current LCU | Estonia |
| 2000s | -6,370 current LCU | 51.52 million current LCU | 51.53 million current LCU | Estonia |
| 2010s | -22,720 current LCU | 24.40 million current LCU | 24.42 million current LCU | Estonia |
| 2020s | 0 current LCU | 123.51 million current LCU | 123.51 million current LCU | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Cuba or Estonia?
- Estonia, at 28.88 million current LCU against 1.00 million current LCU in Cuba as of 2025.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Cuba and Estonia?
- 27.88 million current LCU, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Estonia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Estonia rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Cuba ranks 40th and Estonia ranks 38th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.