Comoros vs Israel: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Comoros
- Israel
How they compare
Comoros currently reports 0 current LCU against 0 current LCU in Israel, a difference of 0 current LCU.
The two have swapped places 18 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Israel ahead.
Comoros ranks 77th and Israel ranks 77th of 186 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 1 and Israel in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Israel | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | -81,640 current LCU | 682.31 million current LCU | 682.39 million current LCU | Israel |
| 1990s | -164,135 current LCU | 211.51 million current LCU | 211.68 million current LCU | Israel |
| 2000s | 101,860 current LCU | 237,100 current LCU | 135,240 current LCU | Israel |
| 2010s | 0 current LCU | 525,800 current LCU | 525,800 current LCU | Israel |
| 2020s | 0 current LCU | -2.46 million current LCU | 2.46 million current LCU | Comoros |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Comoros or Israel?
- Comoros, at 0 current LCU against 0 current LCU in Israel as of 2025.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Comoros and Israel?
- 0 current LCU, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Israel?
- 46 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2025.
- How do Comoros and Israel rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Comoros ranks 77th and Israel ranks 77th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.