Chile vs Lebanon: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Chile
- Lebanon
How they compare
Chile currently reports -886,300 current LCU against -1.00 million current LCU in Lebanon, a difference of 113,700 current LCU.
The two have swapped places 15 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Lebanon ahead.
Chile ranks 150th and Lebanon ranks 151st of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Lebanon in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -108.37 billion current LCU | 111.33 billion current LCU | 219.70 billion current LCU | Lebanon |
| 2000s | -394,580 current LCU | 80 current LCU | 394,660 current LCU | Lebanon |
| 2010s | 61,160 current LCU | -130 current LCU | 61,290 current LCU | Chile |
| 2020s | -136,900 current LCU | -1.07 million current LCU | 934,700 current LCU | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Chile or Lebanon?
- Chile, at -886,300 current LCU against -1.00 million current LCU in Lebanon as of 2025.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Chile and Lebanon?
- 113,700 current LCU, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Lebanon?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Lebanon rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Chile ranks 150th and Lebanon ranks 151st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.