Burkina Faso vs Croatia: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Burkina Faso
- Croatia
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 0 current LCU against 0 current LCU in Croatia, a difference of 0 current LCU.
The two have swapped places 16 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Croatia ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 77th and Croatia ranks 77th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 2 and Croatia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Croatia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -13,100 current LCU | 200,000 current LCU | 213,100 current LCU | Croatia |
| 2000s | 30 current LCU | -300,000 current LCU | 300,030 current LCU | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 10 current LCU | 300,000 current LCU | 299,990 current LCU | Croatia |
| 2020s | 0 current LCU | -166,667 current LCU | 166,667 current LCU | Burkina Faso |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Burkina Faso or Croatia?
- Burkina Faso, at 0 current LCU against 0 current LCU in Croatia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Burkina Faso and Croatia?
- 0 current LCU, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Croatia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
- How do Burkina Faso and Croatia rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Burkina Faso ranks 77th and Croatia ranks 77th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.