Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Botswana: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Botswana
How they compare
Botswana currently reports -2.52 billion current LCU against -2.99 billion current LCU in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 469.65 million current LCU.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Botswana has been ahead every year.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 173rd and Botswana ranks 171st of 186 countries.
Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Botswana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -1.95 billion current LCU | 258.20 million current LCU | 2.20 billion current LCU | Botswana |
| 2010s | -2.23 billion current LCU | 1.31 billion current LCU | 3.54 billion current LCU | Botswana |
| 2020s | -1.76 billion current LCU | 5.01 billion current LCU | 6.76 billion current LCU | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Botswana?
- Botswana, at -2.52 billion current LCU against -2.99 billion current LCU in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2025.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Botswana?
- 469.65 million current LCU, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Botswana?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Botswana rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 173rd and Botswana ranks 171st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.