Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs Papua New Guinea: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP

Bolivia, Plurinational State of
0 current LCU
in 2024
Papua New Guinea
0 current LCU
in 2004
Bolivia, Plurinational State of rank
77th
Papua New Guinea rank
77th

Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time

  • Bolivia, Plurinational State of
  • Papua New Guinea
-20.0M-10.0M010.0M196119922024

How they compare

Bolivia, Plurinational State of currently reports 0 current LCU against 0 current LCU in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0 current LCU.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 77th and Papua New Guinea ranks 77th of 186 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bolivia, Plurinational State of averaged higher in 2 and Papua New Guinea in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia, Plurinational State of Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1970s -0.3 current LCU -5.74 million current LCU 5.74 million current LCU Bolivia, Plurinational State of
1980s 0 current LCU 1.20 million current LCU 1.20 million current LCU Papua New Guinea
1990s -30 current LCU 10,200 current LCU 10,230 current LCU Papua New Guinea
2000s 20 current LCU 0 current LCU 20 current LCU Bolivia, Plurinational State of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Bolivia, Plurinational State of or Papua New Guinea?
Bolivia, Plurinational State of, at 0 current LCU against 0 current LCU in Papua New Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Papua New Guinea?
0 current LCU, with Bolivia, Plurinational State of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Papua New Guinea?
35 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2004.
How do Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Papua New Guinea rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 77th and Papua New Guinea ranks 77th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs Papua New Guinea: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/discrepancy-in-expenditure-estimate-of-gdp-current-lcu/bolivia/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/discrepancy-in-expenditure-estimate-of-gdp-current-lcu/bolivia/papua-new-guinea/">Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs Papua New Guinea: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (current LCU)
Unit
current LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
186 places, 8,499 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.