Belarus vs New Zealand: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Belarus
- New Zealand
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 996.60 million current LCU against 611.00 million current LCU in New Zealand, a difference of 385.60 million current LCU.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.6 times New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 27th and New Zealand ranks 28th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 3 and New Zealand in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 262,130 current LCU | 34.70 million current LCU | 34.44 million current LCU | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 83.88 million current LCU | -100,000 current LCU | 83.98 million current LCU | Belarus |
| 2010s | 943.58 million current LCU | -300,000 current LCU | 943.88 million current LCU | Belarus |
| 2020s | 4.11 billion current LCU | 122.40 million current LCU | 3.98 billion current LCU | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Belarus or New Zealand?
- Belarus, at 996.60 million current LCU against 611.00 million current LCU in New Zealand as of 2025.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Belarus and New Zealand?
- 385.60 million current LCU, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and New Zealand?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Belarus and New Zealand rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Belarus ranks 27th and New Zealand ranks 28th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.