Austria vs Belarus: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Austria
- Belarus
How they compare
Austria currently reports 1.04 billion current LCU against 996.60 million current LCU in Belarus, a difference of 39.71 million current LCU.
The two have swapped places 15 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Belarus ahead.
Austria ranks 26th and Belarus ranks 27th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 1 and Belarus in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Belarus | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 184.78 million current LCU | 262,130 current LCU | 184.52 million current LCU | Austria |
| 2000s | -65.76 million current LCU | 83.88 million current LCU | 149.64 million current LCU | Belarus |
| 2010s | -243.16 million current LCU | 943.58 million current LCU | 1.19 billion current LCU | Belarus |
| 2020s | 276.33 million current LCU | 3.59 billion current LCU | 3.31 billion current LCU | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Austria or Belarus?
- Austria, at 1.04 billion current LCU against 996.60 million current LCU in Belarus as of 2025.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Austria and Belarus?
- 39.71 million current LCU, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Belarus?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Austria and Belarus rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Austria ranks 26th and Belarus ranks 27th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.