Australia vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Australia
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
How they compare
Australia currently reports -1.45 billion current LCU against -2.99 billion current LCU in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 1.54 billion current LCU.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 170th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 173rd of 186 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 200,000 current LCU | -1.95 billion current LCU | 1.95 billion current LCU | Australia |
| 2010s | 900,000 current LCU | -2.23 billion current LCU | 2.23 billion current LCU | Australia |
| 2020s | -240.50 million current LCU | -1.76 billion current LCU | 1.51 billion current LCU | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Australia or Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- Australia, at -1.45 billion current LCU against -2.99 billion current LCU in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2025.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Australia and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- 1.54 billion current LCU, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Australia and Bosnia and Herzegovina rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Australia ranks 170th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 173rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.