Albania vs Japan: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Albania
- Japan
How they compare
Albania currently reports 0 current LCU against 0 current LCU in Japan, a difference of 0 current LCU.
The two have swapped places 20 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Japan ahead.
Albania ranks 77th and Japan ranks 77th of 186 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Albania averaged higher in 1 and Japan in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Albania | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | -589.29 million current LCU | 2.08 trillion current LCU | 2.08 trillion current LCU | Japan |
| 1990s | -1.97 billion current LCU | -583.19 billion current LCU | 581.22 billion current LCU | Albania |
| 2000s | 0 current LCU | 10.00 million current LCU | 10.00 million current LCU | Japan |
| 2010s | -1,140 current LCU | 30.00 million current LCU | 30.00 million current LCU | Japan |
| 2020s | -53,520 current LCU | 0 current LCU | 53,520 current LCU | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Albania or Japan?
- Albania, at 0 current LCU against 0 current LCU in Japan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Albania and Japan?
- 0 current LCU, with Albania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Japan?
- 45 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.
- How do Albania and Japan rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Albania ranks 77th and Japan ranks 77th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.