Central African Republic vs Denmark: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (current LCU), annual

Central African Republic
100 % change on previous year
in 2025
Denmark
100 % change on previous year
in 2025
Central African Republic rank
20th
Denmark rank
21st

Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (current LCU), annual over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Denmark
-50005001.0k196119932025

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 100 % change on previous year against 100 % change on previous year in Denmark, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 23 shared years of data; in 1972 it was Central African Republic ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 20th and Denmark ranks 21st of 173 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 2 and Denmark in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Denmark Difference Ahead
1970s 50 % change on previous year -50 % change on previous year 100 % change on previous year Central African Republic
1980s 0 % change on previous year 50 % change on previous year 50 % change on previous year Denmark
1990s -100 % change on previous year 100 % change on previous year 200 % change on previous year Denmark
2000s 162 % change on previous year 2.66 % change on previous year 159.34 % change on previous year Central African Republic
2010s -37.67 % change on previous year 113.41 % change on previous year 151.08 % change on previous year Denmark
2020s 4.92 % change on previous year 119.91 % change on previous year 114.99 % change on previous year Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp (current lcu), annual, Central African Republic or Denmark?
Central African Republic, at 100 % change on previous year against 100 % change on previous year in Denmark as of 2025.
What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp (current lcu), annual between Central African Republic and Denmark?
0 % change on previous year, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Denmark?
23 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2025.
How do Central African Republic and Denmark rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp (current lcu), annual?
Central African Republic ranks 20th and Denmark ranks 21st of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (current LCU), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Denmark: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (current LCU), annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/discrepancy-in-expenditure-estimate-of-gdp-current-lcu-annual-growth-rate/central-african-republic/denmark/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/discrepancy-in-expenditure-estimate-of-gdp-current-lcu-annual-growth-rate/central-african-republic/denmark/">Central African Republic vs Denmark: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (current LCU), annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (current LCU), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 5,258 data points, 1961–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (current LCU). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.