Uganda vs Viet Nam: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Uganda
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Uganda currently reports -11.97 trillion constant LCU against -30.95 trillion constant LCU in Viet Nam, a difference of 18.98 trillion constant LCU.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Viet Nam ahead.
Uganda ranks 153rd and Viet Nam ranks 154th of 154 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Uganda | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -3.06 trillion constant LCU | -11.66 trillion constant LCU | 8.60 trillion constant LCU | Uganda |
| 2020s | -4.58 trillion constant LCU | -32.40 trillion constant LCU | 27.81 trillion constant LCU | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Uganda or Viet Nam?
- Uganda, at -11.97 trillion constant LCU against -30.95 trillion constant LCU in Viet Nam as of 2025.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Uganda and Viet Nam?
- 18.98 trillion constant LCU, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Uganda and Viet Nam?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2025.
- How do Uganda and Viet Nam rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Uganda ranks 153rd and Viet Nam ranks 154th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the underlying series have been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country.