Tonga vs Palestine, State of: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Tonga
- Palestine, State of
How they compare
Tonga currently reports -110.96 million constant LCU against -118.60 million constant LCU in Palestine, State of, a difference of 7.64 million constant LCU.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Palestine, State of ahead.
Tonga ranks 119th and Palestine, State of ranks 120th of 154 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Tonga averaged higher in 1 and Palestine, State of in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Tonga | Palestine, State of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -14.49 million constant LCU | 115.23 million constant LCU | 129.72 million constant LCU | Palestine, State of |
| 2020s | -43.91 million constant LCU | -142.26 million constant LCU | 98.35 million constant LCU | Tonga |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Tonga or Palestine, State of?
- Tonga, at -110.96 million constant LCU against -118.60 million constant LCU in Palestine, State of as of 2024.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Tonga and Palestine, State of?
- 7.64 million constant LCU, with Tonga ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tonga and Palestine, State of?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2024.
- How do Tonga and Palestine, State of rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Tonga ranks 119th and Palestine, State of ranks 120th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the underlying series have been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country.