Paraguay vs Sri Lanka: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Paraguay
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 0.3896 constant LCU against 0.0078 constant LCU in Paraguay, a difference of 0.3818 constant LCU.
That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 49.9 times Paraguay's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Paraguay ahead.
Paraguay ranks 64th and Sri Lanka ranks 61st of 154 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Paraguay averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Paraguay | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0031 constant LCU | -8,380 constant LCU | 8,380 constant LCU | Paraguay |
| 2020s | 0 constant LCU | 16.94 constant LCU | 16.94 constant LCU | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Paraguay or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 0.3896 constant LCU against 0.0078 constant LCU in Paraguay as of 2025.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Paraguay and Sri Lanka?
- 0.3818 constant LCU, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Paraguay and Sri Lanka?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2025.
- How do Paraguay and Sri Lanka rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Paraguay ranks 64th and Sri Lanka ranks 61st of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the underlying series have been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country.