Nicaragua vs Tajikistan: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Nicaragua
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 4.66 billion constant LCU against 3.74 billion constant LCU in Tajikistan, a difference of 910.93 million constant LCU.
That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.2 times Tajikistan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Tajikistan ahead.
Nicaragua ranks 25th and Tajikistan ranks 26th of 154 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Nicaragua averaged higher in 1 and Tajikistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -44.91 million constant LCU | 1.07 billion constant LCU | 1.12 billion constant LCU | Tajikistan |
| 2010s | 1.04 billion constant LCU | 1.93 billion constant LCU | 885.99 million constant LCU | Tajikistan |
| 2020s | 2.19 billion constant LCU | 1.83 billion constant LCU | 365.93 million constant LCU | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Nicaragua or Tajikistan?
- Nicaragua, at 4.66 billion constant LCU against 3.74 billion constant LCU in Tajikistan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Nicaragua and Tajikistan?
- 910.93 million constant LCU, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Tajikistan?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Nicaragua and Tajikistan rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Nicaragua ranks 25th and Tajikistan ranks 26th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the underlying series have been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country.