Namibia vs Oman: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Namibia
- Oman
How they compare
Oman currently reports 94,000 constant LCU against 10,742 constant LCU in Namibia, a difference of 83,258 constant LCU.
That makes Oman's figure about 8.8 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Namibia ahead.
Namibia ranks 59th and Oman ranks 56th of 153 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 1 and Oman in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -3,750 constant LCU | -100,000 constant LCU | 96,250 constant LCU | Namibia |
| 2020s | -669.37 constant LCU | 25,200 constant LCU | 25,869 constant LCU | Oman |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Namibia or Oman?
- Oman, at 94,000 constant LCU against 10,742 constant LCU in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Namibia and Oman?
- 83,258 constant LCU, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Oman?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2024.
- How do Namibia and Oman rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Namibia ranks 59th and Oman ranks 56th of 153 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the underlying series have been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country.