Malta vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Malta
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports -1.36 million constant LCU against -52.20 million constant LCU in Malta, a difference of 50.84 million constant LCU.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2020 it was Malta ahead.
Malta ranks 115th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 112th of 154 countries.
Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Malta or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Tanzania, United Republic of, at -1.36 million constant LCU against -52.20 million constant LCU in Malta as of 2025.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Malta and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 50.84 million constant LCU, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2020 to 2025.
- How do Malta and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Malta ranks 115th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 112th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the underlying series have been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country.