Maldives vs Philippines: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Maldives
- Philippines
How they compare
Philippines currently reports -0.3682 constant LCU against -100 constant LCU in Maldives, a difference of 99.63 constant LCU.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Philippines ahead.
Maldives ranks 104th and Philippines ranks 102nd of 154 countries.
Maldives has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Maldives | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 constant LCU | 0 constant LCU | 0 constant LCU | — |
| 2020s | 6,800 constant LCU | 37.15 constant LCU | 6,763 constant LCU | Maldives |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Maldives or Philippines?
- Philippines, at -0.3682 constant LCU against -100 constant LCU in Maldives as of 2025.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Maldives and Philippines?
- 99.63 constant LCU, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and Philippines?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2024.
- How do Maldives and Philippines rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Maldives ranks 104th and Philippines ranks 102nd of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the underlying series have been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country.