Lesotho vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Lesotho
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports -1.36 million constant LCU against -4.00 million constant LCU in Lesotho, a difference of 2.64 million constant LCU.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
Lesotho ranks 113th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 112th of 154 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 1 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Tanzania, United Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 constant LCU | 736.92 billion constant LCU | 736.92 billion constant LCU | Tanzania, United Republic of |
| 2020s | 25.79 million constant LCU | -159,333 constant LCU | 25.95 million constant LCU | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Lesotho or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Tanzania, United Republic of, at -1.36 million constant LCU against -4.00 million constant LCU in Lesotho as of 2025.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Lesotho and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 2.64 million constant LCU, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2025.
- How do Lesotho and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Lesotho ranks 113th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 112th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the underlying series have been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country.