Lesotho vs Sudan: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Lesotho
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports -132,607 constant LCU against -4.00 million constant LCU in Lesotho, a difference of 3.87 million constant LCU.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Lesotho ahead.
Lesotho ranks 113th and Sudan ranks 110th of 154 countries.
Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 650 constant LCU | -550 constant LCU | 1,200 constant LCU | Lesotho |
| 2020s | 25.79 million constant LCU | 120,170 constant LCU | 25.67 million constant LCU | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Lesotho or Sudan?
- Sudan, at -132,607 constant LCU against -4.00 million constant LCU in Lesotho as of 2025.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Lesotho and Sudan?
- 3.87 million constant LCU, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Sudan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2025.
- How do Lesotho and Sudan rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Lesotho ranks 113th and Sudan ranks 110th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the underlying series have been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country.