Lebanon vs Uruguay: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Lebanon
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports -1,000 constant LCU against -57,700 constant LCU in Lebanon, a difference of 56,700 constant LCU.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Lebanon ahead.
Lebanon ranks 109th and Uruguay ranks 106th of 154 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Lebanon averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lebanon | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 235.66 billion constant LCU | 500 constant LCU | 235.66 billion constant LCU | Lebanon |
| 2020s | -479.31 billion constant LCU | 400 constant LCU | 479.31 billion constant LCU | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Lebanon or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at -1,000 constant LCU against -57,700 constant LCU in Lebanon as of 2025.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Lebanon and Uruguay?
- 56,700 constant LCU, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Uruguay?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2024.
- How do Lebanon and Uruguay rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Lebanon ranks 109th and Uruguay ranks 106th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the underlying series have been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country.