Lebanon vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Lebanon
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports -57,700 constant LCU against -1.36 million constant LCU in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 1.30 million constant LCU.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Lebanon ahead.
Lebanon ranks 109th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 112th of 154 countries.
Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lebanon | Tanzania, United Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 238.33 billion constant LCU | 736.92 billion constant LCU | 498.59 billion constant LCU | Tanzania, United Republic of |
| 2020s | -479.31 billion constant LCU | 80,920 constant LCU | 479.31 billion constant LCU | Tanzania, United Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Lebanon or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Lebanon, at -57,700 constant LCU against -1.36 million constant LCU in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2024.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Lebanon and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 1.30 million constant LCU, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Lebanon and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Lebanon ranks 109th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 112th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the underlying series have been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country.