Kyrgyzstan vs Poland: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Poland
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 24.52 billion constant LCU against 15.72 billion constant LCU in Poland, a difference of 8.80 billion constant LCU.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.6 times Poland's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Poland ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 17th and Poland ranks 19th of 154 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 constant LCU | 398.70 million constant LCU | 398.70 million constant LCU | Poland |
| 2020s | 48.94 billion constant LCU | 8.16 billion constant LCU | 40.78 billion constant LCU | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Kyrgyzstan or Poland?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 24.52 billion constant LCU against 15.72 billion constant LCU in Poland as of 2025.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Kyrgyzstan and Poland?
- 8.80 billion constant LCU, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Poland?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2025.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Poland rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 17th and Poland ranks 19th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the underlying series have been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country.